-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[13.3.X] Fix DQMOfflineConfiguration unit tests #43664
[13.3.X] Fix DQMOfflineConfiguration unit tests #43664
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_13_3_X. It involves the following packages:
@antoniovagnerini, @syuvivida, @rvenditti, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
cms-bot internal usage |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fea7d8/36717/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/dqm-l2 do you have objections to this backport? |
Signing it now. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport of #43586
PR description:
Fixes unit tests failures in IB (link).
from the original description at #43586 (comment)
PR validation:
scram b runtests_TestDQMOfflineConfigurationGotAll
runs fineIf this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
verbatim backport of #43586